Ethics in I-O Psychology
Spring 2009
Instructor: Dr. Stephen Vodanovich
Text: Lowman, R. L. (2006). The ethical practice of psychology in organizations. American Psychological
Association: Washington, DC.
~ Primary Learning Objectives ~
Students will be able to:
1) Develop and give presentations on contemporary, important ethical topics in the field of I/O Psychology.
2) Summarize and evaluate the array of ethical issues covered in the course.
3) Discuss and evaluate case studies in terms of adherence to professional guidelines (e.g., APA)
4) Evaluate, in detail, the impact of ethical issues for individuals, organizations, and society.
5) Logically summarize a given perspective on an ethical issue and identify the strengths and
weaknesses of contrary positions.
~ Approximate Timeline ~ |
||
Date |
Topic |
Presenter |
1/6 |
Introduction/Overview >>> APA Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct || html version || .pdf version |
|
1/13 |
Reporting of Test Results
|
Steve Vodanovich |
1/20 |
Drug Testing Crandford, M. (1998). Drug testing and the right to privacy: Arguing the ethics of workplace drug testing. Journal of Business Ethics, 17 (16), 1805-1815. Link |
|
1/27 |
Genetic Testing MacDonald, C., & Williams-Jones, B. (2002). Ethics and genetics: Susceptibility testing in the workplace. Journal of Business Ethics, 35, 235-241. Link |
|
2/3 |
Personnel Selection Lowman cases: 2 [Validation Efforts with Small Sample Sizes] |
|
2/10 |
Personnel Selection Lowman cases: Personnel Screening for Emotional Stability Developing International Selection Systems |
|
2/17 |
Personnel Selection Lowman cases: 11 [Assessment Center Records] |
|
2/24 |
Organizational Diagnosis and Intervention Lowman cases: 14 [Layoff Notifications] 15 [Survey Reveals Sexual Harassment] |
|
3/3 |
Maintaining Confidentiality Lowman cases: 18 [Confidentiality and survey reporting] 20 [Conflicting obligations in survey research] 23 [Confidentiality of interview data] |
|
3/10 |
No Class (Spring Break) |
|
3/17 |
Organizational Diagnosis and Intervention Lowman cases: 26 [Sharing of Management Development Results] |
|
3/24 |
Managing Consulting Relationships Lowman cases: 28 [Conflict of interests and roles] 29 [Accurately Reporting Research Results]
|
|
3/31 |
Managing Consulting Relationships Lowman cases: 32 [Dual relationships] 33 [Pressures to Implement Psychological Programs Too Soon] |
|
4/1 |
Research and Academic Issues 36 [The Ethics of Reviewing and of Being Reviewed] |
|
4/8 |
Research and Academic Issues Lowman cases: 43 [When Testimony Would Be Compelled] |
|
4/15 |
Ethics of Professional Behavior Lowman cases: 52 [ Responding to Allegations of Misconduct] |
|
4/22 |
Ethics of Professional Behavior Lowman cases: 57 [Evaluating Colleagues' Competencies] |
|
~ Responsibilities and Grading Criteria ~
For each topic, one or more students will be responsible to give a short presentation (possibly based on additional outside readings) and to lead a discussion on the assigned topic. Those not presenting are responsible for reading any assigned material and to be active in the discussion of issues.
Grades will be based on the quality of presentations (70%) and participation in class discussions (30%).
Class attendance is required. Each unexcused absence will result in half of a letter grade reduction in the final grade