Designing your Course to Meet Quality Standards
ATC subscribes to the Quality Matters (QM) Rubric Standards as guidelines for developing new online courses and as a strategy for improving existing courses.
You will find reference to the QM Standards throughout this site. An overview of each standard with links to further information is provided in the bulleted list below. To receive a PDF copy of the fully annotated version of the Quality Matters rubric, complete with strategies and examples for meeting each standard for online course design, contact Cindy Mersereau at cmersereau@uwf.edu.
The rubric serves as an excellent checklist as you design your online course.
A well-planned, detailed course overview and introduction guides students through the design of the course and helps them understand course expectations. It is your opportunity to begin to build a community of learners as soon as a course begins. It can also help reduce the number of emails with questions related to navigating the course, locating course materials, turning in assignments, testing procedures, etc.
QM General Standard 1 states: The overall design of the course is made clear to the student at the beginning of the course.
Whether you are developing a new online course or improving a current course, writing effective Student Learning Objectives (or Outcomes) is critical to developing a pedagogically sound, functioning course. Appropriate time should be spent in the beginning of course design deciding what you want students to learn. Clarifying intended learning objectives provides a basis for determining teaching activities and assessment strategies.
QM General Standard 2 states: Learning objectives are clearly stated and explained. They assist students in focusing their efforts in the course.
Alignment: This standard is included in Alignment. (Critical course components work together to ensure that students achieve the desired learning outcomes.)
Dr. Nancy Hastings, Assistant Professor - Engineering and Computer Technology Department, and UWF's Faculty QM Scholar, shares strategies and best practices for constructing course- and module-level objectives and clearly articulating your course learning objectives to your online students, in the following archived Elluminate session:
The link below leads to a PDF document which illustrates how Dr. Hastings improved the way she communicates lesson level objectives to her online students, based on QM design standard 2.
*Churches, A. 2007, Educational Origami, Bloom's and ICT Tools, retrieved from http://techlearning.com/article/8670
Developing effective assessments that validate the achievement of specific Student Learning Objectives (or Outcomes) is critical to developing a pedagogically sound, functioning course. Once you have decided what you want students to learn, you must then determine and develop what the students must do to demonstrate that they have, in fact, learned what is stated in the learning objectives. Clear learning objectives provide the basis for determining assessment strategies.
QM General Standard 3 states: Assessment strategies use established ways to measure effective learning, evaluate student progress by reference to stated learning objectives, and are designed to be integral to the learning process.
Alignment: This standard is included in Alignment. (Critical course components work together to ensure that students achieve the desired learning outcomes.)
In the following archived Elluminate session Dr. Jane Halonen, Dean of CAS, and John Crane from ATC present effective assessment strategies and talk about the importance of aligning assessment activities to stated course learning objectives.
Based on your learning objectives, you begin to gather the content for your course. Content may include videos, presentations, books, e-reserves, websites, simulations and anything authored by you which is added to the course website. While its tempting to include flash files that may jump out on a page - it's important to keep the content relevant to the course and the objectives.
QM General Standard 4 states: Instructional materials are sufficiently comprehensive to achieve stated course objectives and learning outcomes and are prepared by qualified persons competent in their fields.
Alignment: This standard is included in Alignment. (Critical course components work together to ensure that students achieve the desired learning outcomes.)
The following recorded Elluminate session features Dr. Enid Sisskin, from the School of Allied Health and Life Sciences. Dr. Sisskin shares her strategies for providing robust and up-to-date resources and materials to her online students.
Engaging online learners is critical to the success of online courses.
QM General Standard 5 states: Meaningful interaction between the instructor and students, among students, and between students and course materials is employed to motivate students and foster intellectual commitment and personal development.
Alignment: This standard is included in Alignment. (Critical course components work together to ensure that students achieve the desired learning outcomes.)
Use technologies to enhance and improve learning, not to replicate traditional teaching methods.
QM General Standard 6 states: Course navigation and the technology employed in the course foster student engagement and ensure access to instructional materials and resources.
In the following archived Elluminate session, Dr. Dave Dawson, Instructor for the Department of Engineering and Computer Technology, provides examples and shares his strategies for using course technologies to foster student engagement and ensure access to instructional materials and resources.
Follow the link to view the session: Course Technology that Supports and Engages Online Learners
When developing your online course, it's important to put yourself in the role of the student. Ask yourself, "What can I do to the make the course, it's navigation, the content, assignments and activities beneficial to the learning outcomes?" One way to do this is by providing the right resources - beyond the text and multi media learning objects. In many cases, students learning from a distance are truly geographically dispersed - so visiting the campus to check out books, or get help writing a paper is not feasible. In addition, accessing the course materials and engaging in dialogue with peers about the subject at hand can be challenging enough.
QM General Standard 7 states: The course facilitates student access to institutional services essential to student success.When developing your course, it is important to ensure your content is accessible to all students no matter their impairment. Impairments may include blindness or color blindness, deafness, inability to use a mouse or keyboard, etc. Many people think that you must create a text only version of your content to meet accessibility requirements. You can develop a visually appealing and interactive course while maintaining accessibility requirements and standards. A text-only version should be a last resort.
QM General Standard 8 states: The face-to-face and online course components are accessible to all students.
To learn more about the overall Quality Matters program at UWF, visit http://uwf.edu/atc/QM/ or contact Cindy Mersereau at cmersereau@uwf.edu.
.